Just thought i’d put a sort of plan in place, let me know what you think!….

The publication

THE BOOK:

In three parts.

1) collecting the jokes.

6 white british young people went to the small villages of
PETWORTH
LEWES
GODALMING
and collected jokes people were willing to give us. These jokes were most likely told to us in the context of them not being linked back to the person telling us, only through a voice recorder (no names, photographs were taken), and the fact that we were white, young etc.

2) putting the jokes into another context – the comedy night

taking the jokes out of the context in which they were told and putting them in an environment where the social boundaries are completely different and testing the reaction.
a different society, community where the boundaries are completely different…changing what is acceptable.
The actual night being a main part of our publication perhaps. The build up (of who is going to tell them)… the actual performance which will need an introduction of what we are doing, the project etc and then the jokes (probably very awkward but hopefully there will be some sort of reaction)… and then the reaction.

3) a summary of the night and the reaction received?

POSTERS OR VINYL:

A large production of one or a few of the jokes.

 

 

The recording of the night

recording the night could consist of a film, photographs and the manuscript.

What needs to be done

1) we need to sort out the night

  • Sort a script of nearly all of the jokes we got, some nice, some offensive etc
  • ring up a comedy night and perhaps arrange our appearance before hand. the one on tuesday is whoever goes on the night puts their name in a hat but perhaps we can ring and explain what we are doing and wether that would be ok and if we could book a spot? if not there then we will have to try a few places
  • sort out who will do the stand up!! me or IONA?!! just because you are a comic genius naturally?! but its up to you although you are GREAT!!!
  • going to a comedy night on sunday eve just so that we know what were doing abit more
  • sorting out how to document the night

2) the actual publication

  • book and the large joke/jokes?
  • majority of the book will only be able to be sorted out after the comedy night so perhaps could we sort the large joke/jokes now? whether it be a large vinyl or poster? danny do you fancy looking into that, what you think might be appropriate?  and we’ll try and sort out the comedy night tomorrow and sunday?
  • IF we get a comedy night sorted for tuesday then we will have just one week to make the publication which is scccary but im sure if we just delegate tasks etc we should be able to get it done?

 

 

Whats everyone reckon? i know iv just planned all this but i’m just getting abit panicy that nothing is really organised yet so hopefully this helps? let me know what you think!

if all this fails….nipples.

 

 

 

 

 

now that wev collected a few jokes i think we need to see whats the most interesting thing about what wev now got.

We picked the small towns and villages because of the twee quaint ‘britishness’. perhaps naive or just quite patriotic.

The amount of racist jokes shows that perhaps in these small twee british towns and villages, racism is still accepted along side humour which allows this. especially in Lewes where 11 year olds were cracking out racist jokes. but this is a touchy subject because we don’t want to making it appear that Lewes is a racist town? and also i think these racist jokes appear anywhere really. whether it be a small little village or where any of us are from? it isn’t as if it is just the small villages that have these jokes? maybe we should ask in a somewhere like brixton where i doubt we’ll get many racist jokes? or the other way round?

We initially thought it would be interesting to travel jokes so perhaps taking these jokes into a different context…although we’d most likely get stabbed. could any of these joke be travelled around?

Listening back one of the most interesting things is the way people say the jokes…often nervous and stuttering and forgetting the end. the punch line is always the make or break…and people feel a lot more pressure on a joke as the preconception of it having to be funny. writing them down doesn’t have the same impact as hearing them. The punchline os often quite disjointed from the joke

I like it if we played with the audience reaction as you might laugh even though your not supposed to, especially in an exhibition environment.

I think we need a stronger concept for choosing the particualr jokes and what we are trying to say. i don’t know if we can really say that  these small villages have the most racist jokes as iv heard most of them before where i grew up?

I suppose what is the most shocking is the place in contrast with the joke.

Chichester

  • doctor doctor i feel like a pair of curtains, pull yourself together then.
  • theres an english man, irish man and a scotsman. They all work on a building site together and every day they sit down at lunch and open their sandwiches together. The englishman opens his and he has strawberry.
  • why did the tomato blush, because the salad was dressing.
  • what do you call a fit paki, as if.
  • what you call a paki in a dumpster, rumaging.

 

Petworth

  • cockney rhyming slang for the disabled.

Bacon rind- blind.

canary wharf- dwarf

cardinal wallsley- cerebal paulsey

raspberry ripple- cripple

wasps and bees- amputees

rubber and plastic- spastic

tulips and roses- multiple sclarosis.

diet pepsi- epilepsie

benny and the fucking jets- tourettes.

  • (prince charles accent) i err…you know my son wills is marring kate, he went to go and see mummy, and kate said to mummy whats the secret to young life, mummy said wear a seat belt and don’t piss me off.

 

Godalming

-what b makes milk? a boobie

  • what do you call an arabian man between two hairdressers, ali barber
  • what is the difference between pink and purple? the grip
  • whats brown and sticky- a stick
  • Whats long brown and smelly- the unemployment line
  • what does madeline mckann have in common with a submarine? they are both underwater and full of seamen.
  • i’ve got a dog called minton, and he ate my shuttlecock so i said ‘bad Minton’

 

Lewes

  • don’t you find it ironic that the only toilets you can run around in are disabled
  • a man goes to the library and asks for a book on suicide, the librarian says ‘ fuck off you wont bring it back’
  • statistically 9 out of 10 enjoy gang rape
  • what do you call an 80 year old black man…antique farming equipment
  • your mums so fat when she steps on the scales it says her phone number.
  • theres two black people at the bus stop and a white boy goes and stands between them.. and says look mum i made an oreo.
  • why did the baker have brown hands, because he needed a poo.
  • what did the man say when he walked into a bar…ouch
  • your mums so fat when she went to the beach the whales sang ‘we are family’
  • your mums so fat the only way to get her into bed is a cup cake
  • what do you call a load of black people in a swiming pool…coco pops
  • what do you call a load of white people in a swimming pool?…rice crispies
  • what do you call a paki on a bike?… night rider
  • your mums so stupid she tried to drown a fish
  • your mums so stupid when they said the drinks are on the house she climbed up a ladder to get the roof.
  • your mums so stupid she stared at an orange juice carton for two hours because it said concentrate
  • what do you call a black person who has been run over…chocolate spread.
  • whats pink and rusty? madeline mcans bike.
  • whats the difference between a jew and a pizza…pizzas dont scream in the oven
  • why wasn’t jesus born in ireland?…because they couldn’t find 3 wise men and a virgin.
  • whats the difference between a baby and a rock? you can’t fuck a rock
  • how long does it take a black person to shit…9 months
  • what do you call a paki in last place…ran shit.
  • slept like a log last night, woke up in the fireplace.
  • theres a train carriage with 4 people on, an english man, a really sexy blonde woman with big tits, a pakistani and an old woman. the train goes into a tunnel and it goes pitch black and all of a sudden theres a slap noise. the train comes out of the tunnel and the pakistanis rubbing his cheek furiously, the old woman is automatically thinking, hang on when it was dark he’s gone for the blonde birds tits and shes give him a slap. the blonde woman’s thinking, when its gone dark, he’s gone for my tits, missed, got the old womans and she’s give him a slap. and the englishman’s thinking ‘can’t wait for another tunnel to slap that paki again’

 

Abortion Rights Gambling Population
Adoption Gangs Pornography
Affirmative Action Genetic Engineering Poverty
Alcohol Global Warming Prayer In Public Schools
Animal Experimentation Gun Control Prisons
Animal Rights Hate Crimes Racism
Bioethics Health Care Rape
Biological Weapons Homelessness School Violence
Capital Punishment Homosexuality Sex Education
Censorship Human Rights Sexual Harassment
Child Abuse Immigration Smoking
Cloning Internet Privacy Stem Cells
Crime Victims Juvenile Offenders Steroids
Domestic Violence Media Violence Suicide
Driving Under the Influence Medical Ethics Teenage Pregnancy
Drug Legalization Mental Health Terrorism
Eating Disorders Middle East Welfare
Endangered Species National Security Women’s Rights
Environment Nuclear Weapons Women In The Military
Euthanasia Nutrition Workplace Violence
Family Relations Political Corruption  

 

Thinking of subject matters that are now not seen as a public taboo to discriminate against just yet but may be in the future. Features that can’t be helped just as race…. gingers and could we apply the 1950s advertising to gingers whihc probably similarly to racism and sexism…50 years down the line will be completely unacceptable and just as offensive. I know even now it is offensive but no where near on the same level as much racism and sexism?

its hard to be a jew on christmas

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4s5MMLN_NY&feature=related

other stuff….

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Q8WwktUNM8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYAVa9Ii2xs&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXWa9ZIFsH0&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naAjBlLBe0Q&feature=related

Comedy can’t always be safe, and sometimes entertainers need to challenge social orthodoxies. But ‘saying the unsayable’ is different from simply recycling offensive cliches about Mexicans

Naag.com UK launch event in association with asos, London, Britain - 05 Nov 2010Steve Coogan: ‘Forget the World Service; overseas, Top Gear is more frequently the public face of the BBC.’ Photograph: Rex Features

As a huge fan of Top Gear. I normally regard the presenters’ brand of irreverence as a part of the rough and tumble that goes with having a sense of humour. I’ve been on the show three times and had a go at their celebrity-lap challenge, and I would love to receive a fourth invite. But I think that’s unlikely once they have read this. If, however, it makes the Lads question their behaviour for a second – ambitious, I know – it will be worth it.

I normally remain below the parapet when these frenetic arguments about comedy and taste break out. But this time, I’ve had enough of the regular defence you tend to hear – the tired line that it’s “just a laugh”, a bit of “harmless fun”.

Some of the Lads’ comments again, in case you missed them. “Mexican cars are just going to be lazy, feckless, flatulent, overweight, leaning against a fence asleep looking at a cactus, with a blanket with a hole in the middle on as a coat” (Richard Hammond). Mexican food is “sick with cheese on it” (James May).

Jeremy Clarkson added to the mirth by suggesting that the Mexican ambassador (a certain Eduardo Medina-Mora Icaza) would be so busy sleeping he wouldn’t register any outrage. (He wasn’t and he did.)

OK, guys, I’ve got some great ideas for your next show. Jeremy, why not have James describe some kosher food as looking like “sick with cheese on it”? No? Thought not. Even better, why not describe some Islamic fundamentalists as lazy and feckless?

Feel the silence. They’re all pretty well organised these days, aren’t they, those groups? Better stick to those that are least problematic.

Old people? Special needs? I know – Mexicans! There aren’t enough of them to be troublesome, no celebrities to be upset. And most of them are miles and miles away.

The BBC‘s initial mealy-mouthed apology was pitiful. It cited the more benign rivalry that exists between European nations (ah, those arrogant French, over-organised Germans), and in doing so neatly sidestepped one hugely important fact – ethnicity. All the examples it uses to legitimise this hateful rubbish are relatively prosperous countries full of white people. How about if the Lads had described Africans as lazy, feckless etc? Or Pakistanis?

What’s more, this was all spouted by the presenters on one of the BBC’s most successful programmes, with ratings that could only fail to impress Simon Cowell (very fast lap time). Forget the World Service; overseas,Top Gear is more frequently the public face of the BBC.

The Beeb’s hand-wringing suggested tolerance of casual racism, arguably the most sinister kind. It’s easy to spot the ones with the burning crosses. Besides, there is not a shred of truth in Top Gear‘s “comic” stereotype. I can tell you from my own experience, living in the US, Mexicans work themselves to the bone doing all the dirty thankless jobs that the white middle-class natives won’t do.

What makes it worse is that the Lads wear this offensive behaviour as a badge of pride, pleased that they have annoyed those whom they regard, in another lazy stereotype, as sandal-wearing vegans with beards and no sense of humour.

Well here’s some Twitter hot news: I don’t have a beard, I’m not a vegan, I don’t wear sandals (unless they’re Birkenstocks, of course), and I have, I think, a sense of humour. I also know something about comedy. It’s true there are no hard fast rules; it’s often down to judgment calls. It’s safe to say, though, that you can get away with saying unsayable things if it’s done with some sense of culpability.

I’ve been fortunate enough to work with the likes of Peter Baynham, Armando Iannucci, Chris Morris, Simon Pegg, Julia Davis, Caroline Aherne, Ruth Jones, and the Mighty Boosh – some of the funniest and most innovative people in British comedy. And Rob Brydon too.

It’s a diverse, eclectic group of people with one common denominator: they could all defend and justify their comedy from a moral standpoint. They are laughing at hypocrisy, human frailty, narrow-mindedness. They mock pomposity and arrogance.

If I say anything remotely racist or sexist as Alan Partridge, for example, the joke is abundantly clear. We are laughing at a lack of judgment and ignorance. With Top Gear it is three rich, middle-aged men laughing at poor Mexicans. Brave, groundbreaking stuff, eh?

There is a strong ethical dimension to the best comedy. Not only does it avoid reinforcing prejudices, it actively challenges them. Put simply, in comedy, as in life, we ought to think before we speak. This wasn’t one of those occasions. In fact, the comments were about as funny as a cold sweat followed by shooting pains down the left arm. In fact, if I can borrow from the Wildean wit of Richard Hammond, the comic approach was “lazy”, “feckless” and “flatulent”.

Richard has his tongue so far down the back of Jeremy’s trousers he could forge a career as the back end of a pantomime horse. His attempt to foster some Clarkson-like maverick status with his “edgy” humour is truly tragic. He reminds you of the squirt at school as he hangs round Clarkson the bully, as if to say, “I’m with him”. Meanwhile, James May stands at the back holding their coats as they beat up the boy with the stutter.

It’s not entirely their fault, of course. Part of the blame must lie with what some like to call the “postmodern” reaction to overzealous political correctness. Sometimes, it’s true, things need a shakeup; orthodoxies need to be challenged. But this sort of ironic approach has been a licence for any halfwit to vent the prejudices they’d been keeping in the closet since Love Thy Neighbour was taken off the air.

Also, a factor little picked up on elsewhere in the Lads’ remarks is that they do, after all, present a car show. And archaic attitudes are endemic in a lot of motoring journalism. I confess I am an avid consumer and I have to wade through a sea of lazy cliches to get to anything genuinely illuminating.

Jeremy unwittingly cast the template for this. Twenty years ago, when I bought Performance Car magazine, his column was the first I would turn to. It was slightly annoying but unfailingly funny. Since then there have been legions of pretenders who just don’t pass muster. There is a kneejerk, brainless reaction to any legislation that may have a detrimental effect on their God-given right to drive cars anywhere at any speed that they consider safe. They often remind me of the National Rifle Association in the US. It’s a kind of “airbags are for poofs” mentality and, far from being shocking, it’s just shockingly dull.

It would be fine if it was confined to a bunch of grumpy men in bad jeans smoking Marlboros at the side of the Millbrook test track, but it’s not. As I pointed out, it’s the voice of one of the BBC’s most successful programmes.

The Lads have this strange notion that if they are being offensive it bestows on them a kind of anti-establishment aura of coolness; in fact, like their leather jackets and jeans, it is uber-conservative (which isn’t cool).

Gentlemen, I don’t believe in half-criticisms and this has nothing to do with my slow lap times. But, increasingly, you each look like a middle-aged punk rocker pogoing at his niece’s wedding. That would be funny if you weren’t regarded by some people as role models. Big viewing figures don’t give you impunity – they carry responsibility. Start showing some, tuck your shirts in, be a bit funnier and we’ll pretend it all never happened.